accesslop.blogg.se

Who took apple snow leopard picure
Who took apple snow leopard picure






  1. WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE MAC OS X
  2. WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE MAC OS
  3. WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE INSTALL
  4. WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE PRO
  5. WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE SERIES

In the top image, menu bar transparency is off in the bottom image, transparency is on. In Snow Leopard, the menu bar has transparency set to on by default, but it’s definitely more subtle, even with darker desktop backgrounds: This brings the menu bar back to a useful state, solid white with black elements. The only option for better usability is to select Reduce transparency in System Preferences → Accessibility. The problem is that there are cases where the background colour simply isn’t dark enough to warrant a change from black text and icons to white text and icons.

who took apple snow leopard picure

In other words, when Big Sur decides that the desktop background image is dark enough, text and icons on the menu bar become white. The problem is that the wallpaper doesn’t have to be too dark. What happens when the desktop wallpaper has darker colours? Well, menu items and menu bar icons become white, of course. Some may consider this sleek, but it’s just gimmicky and usability-hostile. In Big Sur, the menu bar by default isn’t solid white, but has a noticeable degree of transparency: it takes the colour of the desktop wallpaper behind it, in an attempt to blend in with the rest of the desktop environment. The menu barīack in August 2020 when I started testing the first Big Sur beta versions, I wrote in my Big Sur logbook: Now let’s examine just a few aspects of Snow Leopard’s user interface - just like I did for Big Sur in my logbook - and draw comparisons with Big Sur’s interface.

who took apple snow leopard picure

The system is responsive and I haven’t noticed any particular lags. Although I would have preferred an external SSD for the speed, I must say that using Snow Leopard from the flash drive is a breeze nonetheless. The fastest method is to use Disk Utility - rather, an older version of Disk Utility, from a time when this application was really a utility, and you could use the Restore feature reliably to clone the bootable DVD to (in this case) an external volume.įrom a bootable USB flash drive to another USB flash drive, installation was relatively fast, about 20–25 minutes.

WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE PRO

Since the MacBook Pro doesn’t have an optical drive anymore, I had to create a bootable USB flash drive from my original Snow Leopard DVD Installer.

WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE MAC OS

InstallationĪh, When Mac OS welcomed you after the installation process was complete…

WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE INSTALL

So, after a few frustrating attempts at creating a virtual machine on my current iMac with Mac OS High Sierra, I decided to install Snow Leopard on a USB flash drive, and boot my 2009 MacBook Pro (yes, it’s still alive & kicking) in Snow Leopard from that flash drive. While I am confident when I say that Snow Leopard is the most stable version of Mac OS, I wanted to make sure its user interface was really the good user interface and experience I was remembering. It enjoyed an insane uptime and it was a testament to Snow Leopard’s stability.īut back to my ‘gut-reply’, I wanted to be certain that my fond memories of Snow Leopard weren’t just nostalgia.

WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE MAC OS X

That Mac mini was kept on Mac OS X 10.6.8 for the whole four years it was in my custody (2011–2015) and it was switched off only twice during that period and maybe restarted four or five times in total. So, I used Snow Leopard on my 2009 MacBook Pro for about three years, and then again on a 2010 Mac mini that a friend gave me to maintain, as a sort of offsite backup. On my 2009 MacBook Pro, I kept using it until mid-2012, as Mac OS X 10.7 Lion (released in July 2011) didn’t fully convince me at first, so I waited until at least version 10.7.3 before upgrading. As you know (and if you don’t, here’s a refresher), together with Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Snow Leopard was one of the Mac OS versions with the longest lifespan - almost two years, from August 2009 to July 2011, when the final 10.6.8 v1.1 minor release came out. When I purchased my 15-inch MacBook Pro in July 2009, it came with Mac OS X 10.5.7 (Leopard), but I immediately upgraded to Snow Leopard when it was released a month or so afterwards. It was sort of a gut-reply based largely on fond memories of using that Mac OS version quite extensively.

who took apple snow leopard picure

When I wrote back to those who asked me, I replied Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. It’s a more than fair question, and this piece serves as an answer. A few - some provocatively, some genuinely curious - asked me something along the lines of, Well, if you dislike the current Big Sur UI and Mac experience, what’s an example of Mac OS UI and experience you DO like?

who took apple snow leopard picure

The sheer majority of feedback I received was very positive, with many many people agreeing with me and my observations.

WHO TOOK APPLE SNOW LEOPARD PICURE SERIES

Unlike my four-part series ‌Mac OS Catalina: more trouble than it’s worth, however, it didn’t attract any hate mail at all. My recent article, The reshaped Mac experience, received a lot of attention judging from the response on Twitter and the WordPress analytics - apparently, among other places, it reached Hacker News and Reddit.








Who took apple snow leopard picure